Hi Dears,
but the problem is in SCM system there is no delivery, i am unable to find that.
VIJAY
Hello Experts,
I am working on storage type level planned replenishment.I have activated putaway strategy as addition to existing stock in my storage type.For example:-For product A ,I have two fixed bins B1 and B2.As per sort sequence B1 comes before B2.I have stock in B2 and B1 is empty.When I create replenishment task say for 5 EA ,both B1 and B2 have capacity to accommodate that.But system will go as per sort sequence and will create a task for B1.But I want it to fill bins with partial quantity first.Its not considering partial bins during replenishment task first.Is there any control to achieve this?
Regards,
Khushboo
Hi Dears,
I have created a inbound delivery in ECC it distributed to EWM successfully, but it strucked at SMQ2 of EWM the error says that
Status Text: "Application log 00000000000000089514: Could not convert queue DLVST90CLNT"
Message no. SR053
Function Module: /SCWM/INB_DLV_SAVEREPLICA
Trans: VL32N
Program: SAPMV50A
Status: Sysfail
RFC Connection is ok
i have distributed all the master data from ECC to EWM i.e Item Code, Vendor, Business Partner and Supply Chain Unit
i have maintained number ranges also.
Please help me what is the problem where i can set this
Thanks
VIJAY
Hello
In our business we change the incoterms even after picking and packing of items. The field is not open in outbound delivery order to change. I have tried to add warehouse activity status started and unchecked the field display in the field control profile scdl/out_prd_standard and tried even the same for system profile for the incoterm field but this has not resulted in making the field editable even as soon as ODO is created.
I cant understand why does the system not open this field, what am I missing?
Any clues.
Regards,
Amit
Hi,
When working with POSC i am able to execute scenario with rule based. I want to consider all the HU's need not be moved with POSC.
How to manage this?
regards
Nic
Hi, There,
I am have a issue on the warehouse order - Header - Doc.Ref and item number
I have 2 different inbound delivery in EWM:
delivery 01 - packed with HUs
delivery 02 - without HU
When created WO for those 2 inbound deliveries, I found a different output for those 2 WOs.
delivery 01 - packed with HUs -> WO created without reference document number in WO item
delivery 02 - without HU -> WO created with reference document number & item (inbound delivery number)
I am doing a opportunistic cross-docking testing, and the pick WO won't consider the putaway WO of delivery 01, as there is no reference doc id (found from debug.)
Anyone can give more idea here?
WO of delivery 01 with HU:
WO of delivery 02 without HU:
Cheers,
RG
Dear all,
It is possible to have on the storage type 001 a FIFO picking strategy that propose the batch number A001 and via user exit to allow changing manually that bath number proposed by the system for another one?
If yes, someone know a user exit for that?
Cheers,
Marta
Hi Guru,
I am testing the Opp. CD scearnios, and I am having a issue here for the storage type search sequence determination for stock removal. System version is EWM7.2.
I have done all required configured, but I found It won't pick up the open putaway WT when creating the WT for outbound delivery order with below configuration of storage type search squence for stock removal.
throught the debug, we found the root cause is it found stock removal rule 'LV_FIFO = ture', then it ignore the open putaway WT, below is the screen shot.
more over, we tried to find out why it got the stock removal rule 'FIFO', why it won't select the 'ROCD' as we have all the parameters setup both in master data and transaction doc. Finally, we found that it consider the stock type ' F2' in the outbound delivery order item. And it can't find the appropriate entry in the storage type search sequence for stock removal table. then it pick the first entry, that's why it gets 'FIFO'. Then ignore my open putaway WT.
If I put one more entry in the table as below, then it works.
we have 2 questions here:
1. Why it will ignore the open putaway WT when stock removal rule is FIFO in cross-docking scenario?
2. I don't think adding the F2 into the storage type search sequnece table is corrrect, it should be control by the cross-docking stock determination control configuration. Anyone know what I should do to fix it?
Cheers,
RG.
Dear experts,
I am getting above error with final putaway task is pending for confirmation and hence my warehouse Putaway is not completed.
We are executing following steps
1. With Z tcode posting GR in ECC and creating Inbound delivery(ID). This Inbound delivery creates IDN and ID in EWM and create WT for quality (QI01)and confirms the same. Back in ECC ID posted with PGR with material in quality.
2.Now we take usage decision in /SCWM/QINSP and accepts material and it creates then 2 tasks. One task (123) from QI01 to XY01 consolidation area and final task(456) from XY01 to destination storage type(FC01) and bin.Task 123 got confirmed automatcially but task 456 is pending for confirmation and status is "B".
Please let us know what is the meaning of status "B" and solution to addres this.
Thanks for support
Regards
Prashant
Hi Dears,
but the problem is in SCM system there is no delivery, i am unable to find that.
VIJAY
Hi Experts,
I made settings for production integration with EWM system and created production order and staged it.
It created an outbound delivery at ECC side and the same is distributed to EWM but got struck in queues.
I am expecting the posting changes document to be created for this case. Which is not crated and showing
below messages in queues. "Could not create header data delivery XXXXXXX, system XXXX" Message no. /SCWM/ERPINTEGRATION012
Warning messages: No date/time type found for ERP date/time WSHDRKODAT /SCWM/ERPINTEGRATION 5
Please suggest me in this issue what interfacing i could be missing.
Thank you...
Srini
Hi Friends,
How are you doing?
I need a help and advice in EWM to achieve below requirement from client.
Business Requirement –
We have a scenario where 2 plants (PL1& PL2) assigned to one EWM warehouse WH1 . Finished goods are to be received in PL1 /ROD in the warehouse WH1 and after putaway it should be automatically transferred to PL2/AFS in WH1
by triggering 301 (plant to plant) in ECC.
Configuration done–
Configuration made for availability group / stock type / Party Entl to Dispose.
WH1 -> PL1/ ROD assigned to Availability Group –> ROD –> stock type F1 –> Party Entl (PL1)
WH1-> PL2 /AFS assigned to Availability Group –> AFS –> stock type F2 -> Party Entl (PL2)
WH1 will have 2 party Entitled to Dispose PL1 and PL2. No Default Part Entl is set for WH1.
Final Putaway storage type is assigned Availability Group AFS and mandatory flag is set.
Expected result –
As per above set-up, system is expected to change stock type from F1 to F2 during putaway (as AFS is mandatory in final putaway bin) and in
the background party entitled to dispose for the stock should be changed from PL1 (F1)to PL2 (F2) and should trigger 301 (Plant to Plant) movement in ECC.
Issue –
The Stock was received in WH1 in stock type F1 and Party Entitled PL1 in GR-ZONE. But during putaway task creation system showing error as
below
Could not determine ERP stock data for: WH1- Party Entl -PL1 - F2
Message No. /SCWM/ERPINTEGRATION105
Diagnosis
The transaction you executed causes a stock posting in the ERP system. For this, the system must determine the stock data for the ERP system (such as material, plant, storage location) from the EWM data (such as material, party entitled to dispose, stock type).For the following field, the system could not determine any ERP data: WH1 PL1 F2
Unfortunately, system is not changing the party Entitled to dispose from PL1 to PL2 when it is set to change stock type from F1 to F2 during putaway / bin to bin movement.
I tried to do posting change manually in /SCWM/POST and changed stock type from F1 to F2 and party Entl from PL1 to PL2. This triggered 301 movement in ECC and stock is moved from PL1 to PL2.But Stock movement/ putaway task creation is not allowing to do so.
Can above requirement be achieved in EWM to automatically change the party Entl to dispose / plant when the stock type / Availability group is changed during putaway/ stock movement? Is there any config missing or enhancement is required to be done?
Please help.
Thanks and regards,
Virendra Mokashi
Dear All,
Can anyone provide the complete configuration document for warehouse management with the functionality of the fields which are important.
Thank you...
Hi experts,
maybe an easy question:
I created an TU (/n/scwm/tu), with the name UK_12 (truck going out on 12).
Now this is interfaced via iDoc to ERP
-> now I have a problem saying transport number UK_12 is not in my external number range.
Fine, I can fix this by saying my external number range allows this name,
Next day I have the same TU - UK_12 (as the truck leaves every day on 12).
This can't work as I already have a transport in ERP system with this "number".
How to handle this?
Regards
Michael
Hi All ,
I am working on kit to stock initiated from VAS Order in EWM System . i am able to create VAS Order but when i save it , it throws a runtime eroor "Assertion failed" .
Not able to resolve the issue, please help.
Thanks
Tapan
Hello Gurus,
My client has two ECC systems and they are implementing EWM, is it possible to connect two ECC systems to one EWM system?
I think the question is two fold:
1. Is it technically possible?
2. Are there any limitations or operational challenges with this approach? Are all EWM features available in this case? (I know that CRM when connected to multiple ECC systems loses some of the features so I was wondering if this is case for EWM too)
Thanks in advance for your insight
Hello Experts,
I have a requirement where I want to create 3-4 different stock types which should all belong to same availability group which in turn is linked to only one storage location.So far i have not found this achievable.Is that possible technically in EWM ?
Regards,
Khushboo
Hello,
Please let me know if EWM 9.3 is GA now?
Regards,
Chandra
Hello experts,
I have this requirement to add one more parameter country of origin in putaway search strategy.Can someone guide me on how we can achieve that?
Any help will be highly appreciated.
Regards,
Khushboo
Hello,
I need to know if it is possible to create a mixed storage bin in a storage type tha does not allow to have mixed storage.
Thanks!